This article first appeared in Norwegian in the catalog Forandringer, published by
The Norwegian Industrial Workers' Museum in 2005. This translation (2009) is slightly
rewritten in some places, and an introduction has been added.
The town Rjukan in Telemark, Norway was founded in 1907, based on the enormous hydro-electric resources in the area. The company Norsk Hydro built not only power stations and a saltpetre factory, but also the whole town. Before 1907, this was countryside, with a few farms.
In October 2003, I suggested to The Norwegian Industrial Workers' Museum at Vemork, Rjukan, that they should hire me to do a rephotographic project on the town, and the Vestfjorddalen valley, where the town is situated. The idea was well received, and an exhibiton with 30 double photographs opened on May 1st, 2005. (The reason that 2005 was chosen (and not 2007) was the celebration of the 100th anniversary of Norway leaving the Union with Sweden in 1905.)
Projects like this one have been done before. My source of inspiration has been The Rephotographic Survey Project*, which was done in the U.S. in the 1970s. Their base material was photographs taken on governmnent expeditions that explored the American West in the 1860s and 70s. These pictures were taken across an enormous area, but they were three photographers, and spent three years on the project. I have had one year part time at my disposal, but have worked in a relatively small, and familiar area.
What's special about this project, is that I've had access to 80% of the original negatives. Consequently, I have been able to make an exhibition with 80% original photographs, at the same size, and printed on the same kind of paper. The good thing about this is that the old photographs do not appear as objects (as opposed to old, brown toned prints), but are liberated from nostalgic references, and become equals to the new photographs. With this form of presentation, I think the changes will be more obvious, and I also think this could open up for new possibilities for interpretation, and new reflections with the viewer.
Truth, authenticity, and excactness are central concepts in a project like this. It has been my aim that "everything" should be right. And in most of the pictures, everything is right. But with the relatively short time I had, it has not always been possible to get a 100% excact result, but I feel that the excactness is good enough for the purpose.
In one case trees were cut down to make it possible to take the new picture - Såheim, 1892 by the Swede Axel Lindahl - a spectacular, classic view of the old Såheim, which was an obvious choice for the project. The foliage was so dense, that I only just was able to establish that this really was Lindahl's original vantage point. With help from Norsk Hydro, five large trees were felled, and a somewhat less spectacular view revealed itself.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Axel Lindahl: Såheim, July 7, 1892 |
Per Berntsen: Rjukan, June 2, 2004 |
Per Berntsen: Rjukan, July 8, 2004 |
A lot of the historical pictures that have been candidates for this project proved to be impossible to rephotograph, because the vantage point no longer exists. That is, it is located up to several metres above or below today's ground level. In one case, Highway 37 at Bjørtuft, the camera was elevated about 1.5 metres. There was previously a side track here with a platform, where rock from the Bjørtuft Scree was loaded onto the train, for use on the construction sites at Rjukan. The old picture was most likely taken from this platform.
Almost all of Hydro's old pictures are dated, and it would of course have been desirable to take the new pictures on the same date. For me, weather and lighting conditions have been more important than date, but I have tried to take the pictures as close to the original date as possible.
As mentioned, I have had access to 80% of the original negatives. 16 of these originate from Norsk Hydro; six from NIA's own collection; and one from the Ole Olsen Bakke collection. The rest are by Knud Knudsen (3), Axel Lindahl (1), and Anders Beer Wilse (3). Knudsen's negatives are in the University Library in Bergen; the negatives of Lindahl and Wilse are owned by the Norwegian Folk Museum, but are kept in the National Library in Mo i Rana. I was offered to use a darkroom in Bergen and Mo i Rana, and make the prints there, but it would have taken too much time. I chose instead to to have scans made of the negatives, which were then printed on color photogaphic paper in a lab in Oslo. A sort of hybrid prints, made by combining digital and analog technologies. The ideal thing would have been to print them on black & white fibre base paper like the rest of the exhibition, but the nearest lab who could do this was in Paris.
I hope that other photograhers can be inspired by this project to do similar projects elsewhere. I will in the following describe the equipment and working methods I have been using.

Most of the preparatory work for this project was done on a computer. All the old negatives were scanned in A4, 300 dpi. For scanning glass plates, a newer Epson, like the 4990, or V700/750 will do. A good inkjet printer is also neccessary. Photoshop is required - for editing the scanned pictures, and, as I will come back to later, as an indispensable aid in finding the vantage point for the old pictures.
Depending on what end result you want, the finished pictures can be printed on an inkjet printer, or hybrid prints can be made in a lab. Or, real photographs can be made in the darkroom, if the old negatives are available. Old negatives often have a large format, and you will then need an enlarger for the largest format in the base material. The negatives in this project were with one exception (9 x 12 cm) 13 x 18 cm glass plates. I was lucky to get hold of an old Kodak Specialist 5 x 7" cold light enlarger, which I used to make the prints for this project.
All the new pictures were taken with a 4 x 5" camera. 6 x 9 cm may be sufficient, but I recommend 4 x 5 or larger, since the larger format allows for greater accuracy, and generally makes the work easier. A large selection of lenses may be neccessary - I used five lenses from 90 to 250 mm. But if the base material originates from a single photographer, chances are good that one can manage with fewer lenses.
Having made a preliminary selection from the base material, I made A5 prints of all the pictures. I put these in plastic sleeves in a binder. Then the field work began, trying to find out where all the pictures were taken. To begin with, I used the A5 prints, and an adjustable Linhof finder (an SLR camera with a zoom lens will also serve the purpose) to find the approximate vantage point, and make a qualified guess about what focal length I would need to use for the new picture. By studying light and shadows in the print, I also tried to estimate the time of year, and the time of day the picture was taken.
Then comes the hard bit - finding the excact vantage point. The Rephotographic Survey Project used Polaroid prints as an aid. By taking Polaroids with the same camera they used to take the actual pictures, they could measure distances and angles between certain points in the image, and compare these with the same distances and angles in the old picture. At the time, this was probably the best method, but I was reluctant to use it. It would mean even more equipment to carry around, and Polaroid material was expensive. Besides, I managed to figure out a different method. It involves simple operations in Photoshop, and making prints on overhead film. A description follows here.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 1 |
Figure 2 |
Figure 3 |
Let's say that none of the lenses you have tried are quite right, but that one is closer than the others, (but includes a little too much) and that you are able to get a match by focusing and stopping down. Use this lens, but focus normally, and crop when you scan or enlarge the negative. Many of the pictures I worked with were probably taken with a 210 mm lens on 13 x 18 cm. This corresponds to 150 mm on 4 x 5 – a lens I din't have at the time. So I used the method described above with a 135 mm.
Having developed the film, it is of course exciting to see if the new picture is a match. The most obvious thing to do would be to scan the negative, and compare it with the scan of the old picture. This gives a certain indication, but I haven't found out a method to establish how good the match is. This may be due to my lack of skills in Photoshop. For me it's much easier to find this out in the darkroom – in the following way:
All the vantage points for the new pictures have been documented with a digital camera. I have photographed the camera on tripod from at least two sides, and have tried to include as much information as possible, to make it easy to find the vantage point later. If someone would like to re-do this project in a 100 years, they can find this information at the Norwegian Industrial Workers' Museum.
*Mark Klett, Ellen Manchester og JoAnn Verburg: Second View. The University of New Mexico Press, 1984.
ISBN 0-8263-0751-5.